Freeman, Etc. v. Hiznay
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
Where a banking corporation whose shareholders were individually responsible for its debts to the amount of the par value of their stock in addition to the par value of the shares, entered into consolidation with a title insurance and trust company whose shareholders were not so responsible, and tbe consolidated company was subsequently taken over by tbe Secretary of Banking as receiver because of insolvency, are the shareholders of the consolidated corporation, or any of them, individually liable for its debts, and if so to what extent? That is the question…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buist's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- DeHaven v. PrattSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Gordon v. WinnebergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Harr, SEC. of Bkg. v. BoucherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Bell v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanley Knapp, Jr. v. North American Rockwell Corporation v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Company, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Dodier Realty & Investment Co. v. St. Louis National Baseball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Lopata v. Bemis Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Cope EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Freeman v. HudockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.