Legal Opinion

McFall v. Arkoosh

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, J.-

— On or about April 26, 1919, appellant sold to respondent 1,640 head of sheep for $25,000. It is alleged by respondent that for the purpose of inducing him to pur*245chase the sheep at the price mentioned, appellant represented and guaranteed to him that he, appellant, was the owner of a right to graze and pasture 1,750 head of sheep on the Sawtooth National Forest Reserve and that said right was “appurtenant to.the ownership of the sheep aforesaid,’5 and that appellant agreed that if respondent would purchase the sheep at the price mentioned appellant would set over and transfer to him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Libby v. PelhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Lingle v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mead v. ArnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Barry v. Pacific West Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Osborne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Howard v. MissmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Whitney v. Continental Life and Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API