Legal Opinion

Wiseman v. State Bank and Trust, NA

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 24, 1993No. 93-177PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

On June 29, 1992, the appellants, Danny and Sonya Wiseman, visited their local Toyota-Hyundai car dealership in Pine Bluff and selected to purchase a 1988 Toyota Célica. The Wisemans informed their salesman, Mr. Bill Tucker, that, in order for them to buy the car, an installment plan financing arrangement would have to be obtained. Tucker provided the Wisemans with a credit application which had been supplied to the dealership by the appellee, State Bank and Trust, N.A. Tucker explained that State Bank was not the exclusive financing agent of the dealer and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Shipp v. Bell & Ross Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hames v. CravensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Calandro v. ParkersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Johnson v. Bank of BentonvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2000
  4. Anthony L. Washington v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  5. BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Mid-Ark Utilities & Rig Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API