Legal Opinion
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Mid-Ark Utilities & Rig Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided October 30, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00042Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 1:18-cv-00042-KGB MID-ARK UTILITIES & RIG SERVICES, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is an amended motion for default judgment against defendant Mid-Ark Utilities & Rig Services, Inc. (“Mid-Ark”), filed by plaintiff BHB Harris Bank, N.A. (“BHB”) (Dkt. No. 30). Mid-Ark has not appeared in this action or responded to BHB’s motion, and the time to respond has passed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants BHB’s motion for default. I. Factual And…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Murray v. LeneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. And Michael Ackerman, Individually v. Fingerhut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States of America, on Behalf of and for the Use of Time Equipment Rental & Sales, Inc. v. Gary L. Harre, Yancey Lamar AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Taylor v. City of Ballwin, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.