Legal Opinion

Nevada Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Smith

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2013No. 56801PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Pickering, C.J.:

On this appeal we consider NRS 286.541(2), governing retirement by members of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS). PERS interprets NRS 286.541(2) as limiting retirement eligibility. In its view, a member who goes from one PERS-eligible job to another without a break in service and retiring from PERS may not thereafter retire and receive benefits from PERS, until the member effectively retires from his or her new PERS-eligible job. A contrary interpretation, PERS maintains, would allow in-service distributions, violating NRS 286.541 and the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. I. Cox Construction Co. v. CH2 Investments, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. MorrosNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United Exposition Service Co. v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. MilkoNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Williams v. Clark County District AttorneyNevada Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Bombardier Transp. (Holdings) USA, Inc. v. Nev. Labor Comm'rNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Engelson v. Dignity HealthCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2023
  4. BOMBARDIER TRANSP. (HOLDINGS) USA INC. VS. NEVADA LABOR COMM'RNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  5. BOMBARDIER TRANSP. (HOLDINGS) USA INC. VS. NEVADA LABOR COMM'RNevada Supreme Court · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API