Legal Opinion

Brian K. Maloney v. State Of Washington

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 2, 2017No. 48392-1-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

¶1 Brian Keith Maloney appeals the superior court’s denial of his motion seeking costs under RCW 4.84.010 after his petition for restoration of firearm rights was granted. We hold that Maloney is not entitled to costs because RCW 4.84.010 applies only to civil proceedings and Maloney’s petition for restoration of firearm rights arose from a criminal statute and was an extension of his criminal proceeding. We also hold that Maloney is not the prevailing party on appeal, so he is not entitled to costs on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.

FACTS

¶2 In 1980 and 1983, Maloney was convicted of second…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Tetro v. TetroWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sean Michael Doran v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API