Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Heiser

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1984No. 2684PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant bail. 1 Appellant contends that the court below erred in denying bail because the Commonwealth failed to prove either of the alternate grounds that he had committed a capital offense or that he would not appear for trial regardless of the character or the amount of the bail. We find that the Commonwealth satisfied its burden of proof as to the former ground and, accordingly, affirm the order of the lower court.

On August 15, 1982, appellant was arrested and charged with criminal homicide in the death of one Paul Kulina. He was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Loren Hamilton Fry v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Ruckinger v. WeichtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. Hamborsky, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API