Commonwealth v. Hamborsky
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County
1Opinion of the Court
LESKINEN, J,
Before the court is the Commonwealth’s petition for bond revocation. The Commonwealth did not present evidence at either of two bond hearings that establishes that the “proof is evident or presumption great” that the defendant will be convicted of murder in the first or second degree. Under Article I, Section 14 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, therefore, the request to revoke bail must be denied. Because the precise meaning of Article I, Section 14 has never been made clear under the circumstances presented here, and because the parties in this case vehemently disagree on that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Commonwealth v. TorresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Norman J. Mastrian v. Kermit Hedman, Ramsey County Sheriff, and the State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Commonwealth v. UpsherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bitter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.