Legal Opinion

Lano v. Rochester Germicide Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1962No. 38,269, 38,342PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

These appeals, which have been consolidated for hearing, are from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for substituted findings or for a new trial and from a judgment in favor of defendant.

This action was brought to recover a sum which plaintiff asserts is presently payable under a profit-sharing pension plan instituted when he was employed by defendant. The only question for review is whether the defendant has a right to defer payments until plaintiff reaches the age of 65 in the year 1976.

The defendant is engaged in the business of producing and distributing sanitary supplies.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clark v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Home Savings Bank v. GertenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Malone v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Northland Produce Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Copper Butte Mines v. GuertinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Knutsen v. FrushourIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Powers v. Fisher Controls Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Swift v. Shop Rite Food Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Walters v. Common School Districts Nos. 2550, 2551, 2583, & 2585Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API