Joe B. Driver v. Arthur Hinnant, Superintendent Halifax County Prison Unit of the North Carolina State Prison Department
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge:
The question is whether a chronic alcoholic, as appellant Joe B. Driver has been proved and confesses to be, can Constitutionally be criminally convicted and sentenced, as he was, for public drunkenness.
Admitting the truth of the charge under the North Carolina statute, he grounded his defense on the Eighth Amendment, applied to the States under the due process clause of the Fourteenth, barring the infliction of “cruel and unusual” punishment. His argument may be condensed in this syllogism: Driver’s chronic alcoholism is a disease which has destroyed the power…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Francis v. ResweberSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Driver v. HinnantDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965
- State v. DriverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
3Cited by71 opinions
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Manning v. Caldwell for City of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Dewitt Easter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Albert Watson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Hughes v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.