George Esterly & Son v. Van Slyke
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J.
1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.
This is an action upon two promissory notes, each for $100, executed by defendants in error to plaintiffs in error for the purchase price of an Esterly harvester and binder. The cause has been tried three times. The first tidal resulted in a verdict in favor of defendants; the second in a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $90. These verdicts were set aside by the district court and new trials granted. The third trial resulted in a verdict in favor of defendants, which the court refused to molest, and proceedings in error are now prosecuted by plaintiffs in this court.
The answer filed by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. CrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Chariton Plow Co. v. DavidsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Newton Wagon Co. v. DiersNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bailey v. SpindlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- D. M. Osborn Co. v. JordanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Esterly Harvesting Machine Co. v. FrolkeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Miller Rubber Products Co. v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Sabin v. CameronNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.