Legal Opinion
Chariton Plow Co. v. Davidson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Eeeoe to the district court for Otoe county. Tried below before Pound, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ch. J. ,
The main question involved in this case arises upon the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury as prayed by the plaintiff, as follows:
*375“ 6. The jury are further instructed that when a person. sets up fraud to defeat a recovery on a note, and supports such defense by his own testimony alone, and the other party to the transaction by his testimony denies the statements of the defendant in respect to such fraud, and both parties are equally credible, have equal opportunities for knowing, and testify with equal fairness, candor, and truthfulness, and neither is corroborated…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vorce v. RosenberyNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Andrews v. RobertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- George Esterly & Son v. Van SlykeNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
- First Nat. Bank of Coleman v. First Nat. Bank of BrownwoodTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.