Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. Crow
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Page County District Cou/rt. AotioN on three promissory notes. Trial by jury. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevebs, J.
The ease was tried in the district court on the theory that the defendant, as a defense, pleaded that the notes were given in consideration of a reaping-machine purchased by him of the plaintiff, which had been warranted, and that it had failed to conform to the warranty, and was worthless. It is difficult to ascertain from the answer the nature and extent of the warranty. The statements in relation thereto are exceedingly loose and general. "Whatever the warranty was, it was not in writing, but was in parol, and made by the agents of the plaintiff.
I. The plaintiff furnished to its agents a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eadie, Guilford & Co. v. AshbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howell v. J. Mandelbaum & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Ruthven Bros. v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Somerville v. Gullett Gin Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- C. Aultman & Co. v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. BackerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.