Legal Opinion · Dissent

McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 17, 1975No. 20038Published

1DissentNess, Justice

(dissenting) :

Being convinced this transfer was a “sale” as opposed to a “gift”, I respectfully dissent.

This matter was before the Court in McLeod v. Sandy Island Corporation, et al., 260 S. C. 209, 195 S. E. (2d) 178 (1973). In that decision this Court held that the ninety-four (94) shares were, in fact, transferred the child, however, that the corporation, under the language of the stock limitation, had the right to show what effect, if any, the knowledge by the wife of the restriction had on the daughter’s right of ownership.

Thomas M. McLeod and his wife Marlene B. McLeod were divorced in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Furman University v. WallerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. City of Orangeburg v. BUFORDSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Diamond Swimming Pool Co. v. BroomeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API