Legal Opinion

City of Orangeburg v. BUFORD

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1955No. 17015PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This proceeding was instituted on June 25, 1949, by the City of Orangeburg to condemn, for the purpose of establishing a public alley, a strip of land approximately 14 by 47 feet belonging to Mrs. Alma K. Buford. The landowner contended that there was no necessity for the taking and further asserted that the value fixed in the City’s declaration was wholly inadequate. A hearing was had before Judge Brailsford who, in an order filed on August 12, 1952, held that a reasonable necessity existed for condemning the property; required the City to deposit an additional sum to secure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Jeffery v. OsborneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ex Parte MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Peoples Nat. Bank of Greenville v. UpchurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. South Carolina State Highway Department v. BoltSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Baptist Foundation for Christian Education v. Baptist CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. Kistler-Collister Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Nelson v. United Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Westboro Weaving Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API