Legal Opinion

Turner v. Otis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Montgomery District Court. Action brought by Turner and wife against Otis, to. set aside a certain settlement and dissolution of the copartnership between the parties. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the facts. The plaintiffs allege that the court, at the March Term, 1881, erred in not opening up the whole settlement and ordering a general accounting, and bring the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action brought by plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, to set aside a settlement. The facts-are these: On October 14, 1873, the plaintiffs and defendant entered into a partnership for the transaction of a banking business. The agreement therefor was in writing. By its terms the partnership was to continue three years. . At the expiration of three years, by further agreement, the partnership was continued for another term of three years, which would carry it to October 14, 1879. On October 9, 1878, the parties entered into a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gage v. ParmeleeIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Brooks v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. DockingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Badder v. SaleebySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Lundquist v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API