Lundquist v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Meeker county for discovery as to all the transactions of, and complete accounting concerning, the partnership of Lundquist & Peterson Brothers, to restrain defendants from diverting any of the property of the partnership, to compel defendants to pay to plaintiff an undivided one-third of all the profits, and to set aside the partnership settlement referred to in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Meeker county for discovery as to all the transactions of, and complete accounting concerning, the partnership of Lundquist & Peterson Brothers, to restrain defendants from diverting any of the property of the partnership, to compel defendants to pay to plaintiff an undivided one-third of all the profits, and to set aside the partnership settlement referred to in the opinion. The ease was tried before Powers, J., and, after his illness, by agreement of the parties was submitted upon a transcript of the evidence taken at the trial to Qvale and Daly, JJ., who…
1Opinion of the Court
• Dibell, C..
This action was brought to set aside as fraudulent a partnership settlement made between the plaintiff and the defendants and for an accounting. There were findings for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for á new trial.
1. The defendants are brothers. The plaintiff is their cousin and married their sister. He came to this country from Sweden in 1875, when 24 years of age, and for two years lived with the father of the defendants on his farm near Grove City in Meeker county. Then he engaged in railroad contracting. In 1886 the father of the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- First National Bank v. StraitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Humphrey v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Howard v. FarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Scheuer v. BerringerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Wilson v. MolineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Porten v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Lundquist v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917