Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,233 Paul J. Robinson v. Leonard J. Heilman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The central issue on this appeal is whether Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185, 96 S.Ct. 1375, 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976) requires reversal of a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in this federal securities litigation. The plaintiffs attempt to avoid the impact of Hochfelder, which came down after judgment was rendered, on two grounds: (1) defendant’s failure to except to a jury instruction which permitted the jury to impose liability for negligence prevents his raising the issue on appeal, under Rule 51 (F.R.Civ.Proc.), and (2) Hochfelder should not be applied to persons like defendant,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Diffenderfer v. Central Baptist Church of Miami, Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Anthony J. Demma, United States of America v. Henry BrulayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Davis v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Bruce Gilchrist v. Jim Slemons Imports, Inc., and Jim SlemonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- McGonigle v. CombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.