Quinette v. Mitschrich

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties appear in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiff, Quinette, alleged that he employed defendant, Mitsehrich, by contract containing this;

“Now, therefore, it is agreed between the parities that the said first party does hereby employ the said second party as his attorney in said suit now pending against the Pullman Palace Oar Company to prosecute said suit or any otheir suit for said injuries that may, in .thq judgment of said second party fee proper to recover damages for the said injuries whether the same be instituted or carried on against the Pullman…