Legal Opinion
Vogel v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1950No. 33849PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an action to recover $1,000 deposited as earnest money pursuant to terms of a contract for the purchase of real estate.
Walter E. Vogel and wife, as seller, and E. W. Fisher and wife, as purchaser, entered into a written contract under date of May 29, 1947, for the sale and purchase of real estate situate in the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Under the terms of the contract there was deposited by the purchaser with Dennis Flournoy, as agent of the seller, the sum of $1,000 as earnest money, the same to be applied on the purchase price provided the terms and conditions of the purchase were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shaeffer v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Teter v. SpoonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Macke v. WagenerNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Dills v. CallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Quinette v. MitschrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- State v. TiedemannMontana Supreme Court · 1961
- Rogers v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Owens v. Automotive Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.