Legal Opinion
Clark-Murphy Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. Foreback
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2006No. 05-1323, 05-1394PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J., joined by Bunning, D. J.,
MOORE, J. (pp. 293-295), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
At issue in this § 1983 action is whether the district court properly denied qualified immunity to 15 Michigan corrections officers on duty at various points during the isolation, dehydration and eventual death of inmate Jeffrey Clark. Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to Clark-Murphy (the representative of Clark’s estate), we affirm the denial of qualified immunity as to 11 of the employees and reverse it as *283to 4 of them (Andy Dyer, Kristine Wake-field,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark-Murphy v. ForebackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Andre Pauwels v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon, Deloitte LLP, Deloitte USA LLP, and Deloitte Tax LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Bous v. McAfeeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
- Ettinoffe v. SheikhDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
- Samuel v. City of Houston, TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023