Furnival State Machinery/Transamerica Insurance Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LEADBETTER, Judge.
In this case, we are asked to determine whether a cost containment statute directed at workers’ compensation providers implicitly alters the Workers’ Compensation Act’s subrogation statute. We hold that it does not.
Claimant James Slye suffered a work-related injury on February 7, 1992, and subsequently required ankle replacement surgery. At the time, employer refused to pay for the surgery, claiming that it was not work related. Slye, not wishing to wait for a final determination, underwent the ankle replacement during the course of litigation, utilizing a separate…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Villanova University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Cleveland Bros. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008