Legal Opinion

Puglio v. Puglio

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 13, 1989No. 6644PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants in an action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate.

The plaintiffs have alleged seven claims of error, six of which implicate the fact-finding function of the trial court and are without merit. The plaintiffs’ sixth claim of error, however, that the trial court erred in refusing to allow Vincent P. Adley to testify on behalf of the plaintiffs, is valid and dispositive of this appeal. We agree with the plaintiffs that it was error on the part of the trial court to refuse to allow Adley to testify as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. First Constitution Bank v. CaldrelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Pheasant Chase Associates v. Pestretto, No. Cv-00-0595819-S (Jul. 31, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  5. Pheasant Chase Associates v. Pestretto, No. Cv00-0595819s (Aug. 9, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API