Legal Opinion

First Constitution Bank v. Caldrello

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 11, 1995No. 11807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The defendants Joseph M. Caldrello and Sandra V. Caldrello1 (hereafter the defendants) appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court as to property they owned. They claim that the trial court (1) improperly denied Joseph M. Caldrello, appearing pro se, the opportunity to argue at the trial, (2) improperly failed to admit certain bank documents into evidence, (3) improperly failed to permit the defendants’ counsel to testify on behalf of the defendants despite having permitted the plaintiff’s counsel to testify, and (4) allowed the appearance of an unfair trial.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Erwin M. Jennings Co. v. DiGenovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Miller v. UrbanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Lebowitz v. McPikeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Sengebush v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. CaldrelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Pheasant Chase Associates v. Pestretto, No. Cv-00-0595819-S (Jul. 31, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  3. Pheasant Chase Associates v. Pestretto, No. Cv00-0595819s (Aug. 9, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API