Legal Opinion
State v. Blake
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 23, 1968PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
The defendant was convicted in a trial to the jury on one count charging indecent assault (General Statutes §53-217) and two counts charging the commission of acts likely to impair the morals of a minor child. General Statutes § 53-21. From the judgment of guilty he takes this appeal.(a)
The state claimed that the defendant indulged in misconduct with Mikey Citak, who, at the time of the trial, was a boy of nine, and with John Briers, who, at the time of the trial, was a -boy of eleven.
Soon after the defendant’s arrest, the father of the Citak boy telephoned the defendant and asked to talk to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Richmond v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- State v. SegerbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Erwin M. Jennings Co. v. DiGenovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- State v. McGuireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. PickeringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.