Legal Opinion

State v. Beck

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2005No. 191PA04Published

1Opinion of the Court

614 S.E.2d 274 (2005)

359 N.C. 611

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Melvin Wayne BECK.

No. 191PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 1, 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General and, Robert Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General for the State-appellant.

Daniel Shatz, Durham, for defendant-appellee.

NEWBY, Justice.

The North Carolina Structured Sentencing Act provides that the "same item of evidence" cannot be used to prove more than one aggravating factor. N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.16(d) (2003). The question presented by this case is whether the phrase "same item…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API