Legal Opinion

Bugariu v. Conley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 17, 1981No. 80-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON

Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant alleging that defendant struck plaintiff and that as a result plaintiff sustained serious physical injuries for which he sought compensatory and punitive damages. At the close of all the evidence, defendant made a motion for a directed verdict, arguing that plaintiff had failed to prove a causal connection between defendant’s act and plaintiff’s injury. The motion was denied and the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $8,000. Defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict.

We reverse.

On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jackson v. NavikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Hannigan v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  4. Haberer v. Moorman Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Hicks v. DonohoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mesick v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Chicago Rotoprint v. Industrial Com.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Niedert Terminals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1996
  5. Chicago Rotoprint v. Industrial Com.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API