Legal Opinion

Dalton v. Ralph E. Mills Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1939No. 27268Published

1Opinion of the CourtSxjtton, J.

1. Where a bill of exceptions fails to show on its face who is defendant in error, the writ of error must, on motion, be dismissed. Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga,. 776 (113 S. E. 190); Fowler v. Wheeler, 176 Ga. 189 (167 S. E. 107); Emmanuel Farm Co. v. Batts, 176 Ga. 552 (168 S. E. 316); Malsby v. Shipp, 177 Ga. 54 (169 S. E. 308); Poteet v. Beaver, 180 Ga. 383 (178 S. E. 721); Vandivere v. Smith, 183 Ga. 326 (188 S. E. 540); Federal Deposit Ins. Cor. v. Thompson, 54 Ga. App. 611 (188 S. E. 737).

2. An acknowledgment of service of the bill of exceptions by an attorney of record in the trial court,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Emanuel Farm Co. v. BattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Malsby v. ShippSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Poteet v. BeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API