Earl Scheib, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOY, J. pro tem. *
In an action now pending in the respondent court petitioner, Earl Scheib, Inc., sued to enjoin the defendants Smee, Aeuff and Carcoa, Incorporated, from unfair competition and use of trade secrets. Summarily stated, plaintiff is a nationally-known, publicly-held company specializing in automobile painting, and claims to have expended considerable funds in accumulating a vast amount of di£ficult-to-obtain information relating to its business, and has evolved a superior method of analyzing this information, which is confidential and not readily available to its competitors.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In re CowderyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Wutchumna Water Co. v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Hicks v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
- Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- River West, Inc. v. NickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Commercial Standard Title Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.