Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Baeza

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1997No. A075264PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

This case raises issues pertaining to a motion to disqualify the attorney simultaneously representing two closely held, family-run corporations, and two of the corporations’ three shareholders. The trial court granted the motion to disqualify the attorney from representation of the corporate parties, but allowed him to continue his representation of the individuals. The minority director/shareholder appeals, contending the court erred in failing to grant the disqualification motion in full. The corporations, on cross-appeal, urge the trial court erred in granting the motion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Cannon v. US Acoustics CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
  5. River West, Inc. v. NickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  2. Adams v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Liberty National Enterprises v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  5. La Jolla Cove Motel & Hotel Apartments, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API