Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 9, 2025No. 5:24-cv-07122Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARIE ENCAR ARNOLD, Case No. 24-cv-07122-EKL (VKD) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE 10 v. PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT 11 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 36 12 Defendant. 13 14 Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) asks the Court to issue 15 a protective order, pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, preventing 16 plaintiff Marie Arnold from taking depositions of Metropolitan and its employees, at least until the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William v. Wenger v. Paul D. Monroe, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Adjutant General of the California National Guard California National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Blakely v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928