Legal Opinion

Mianus Motor Works v. Vollans

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1915No. 12140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered February 14, 1914, granting a new trial, after rendition of a verdict of a jury favorable to the defendant, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

Plaintiff, as the assignee of the Automatic Machine Company, instituted this action for the purpose of recovering for certain machinery sold and delivered to the defendant. The defendant counterclaimed for damages alleged to be due to the breach of an implied warranty. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. The amount claimed to be due as alleged in the complaint was $1,082.10. The *681jury returned a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor for $66.80. A motion for a new trial was interposed upon the ground that the court had committed error in submitting the cause to the jury. This motion was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caldwell Bros. & Co. v. Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fossum v. Timber Structures, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gleason Co. v. CarmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co. v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Seattle School District v. King Plumbing & Heating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Mianus Motor Works v. VollansWashington Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API