Legal Opinion
Gleason Co. v. Carman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1920No. 15416PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered February 1,1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff to recover four hundred dollars, the alleged value of *537certain lighting fixtures manufactured by it for the defendant, under a written contract set out in the complaint as follows:
“June 2, 1917.
“Mrs. N. M. Carman,
“Cheasty Bldg., Seattle.
“Dear Madam: We propose to furnish and install eight (8) special design crystal fixtures as per designs submitted, for the Carman shop; our compensation to be the sum of four hundred dollars ($400) net, and the old fixtures now there to be replaced by the new ones.
“Very truly yours,
“H. E. Grleason Company, “Per H. H. Bailey.
“…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Gaylord Manufacturing Co. v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Graffam v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Los Angeles Olive Growers Ass'n v. Pacific Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Case Shingle & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
- Mayer Life Boat Co. v. Isaacson Co. Iron WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1923