Legal Opinion

LUPPINO INS. CO. v. Vigilant Insurance Co.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 4, 1996No. 1497, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Chief Judge.

The ultimate issue in this appeal is one of insurance coverage; the particular issue is whether appellant Rocco Luppino’s suit against Vigilant Insurance Company is barred by limitar tions. The Circuit Court for Prince George’s County held that it was and granted the- insurer’s motion for summary judgment. We shall reverse that judgment.

Luppino once owned a home in Prince George’s County protected by a Quality Protection Homeowner’s policy issued by Vigilant. On June 24, 1986, he sold the home to Stephen Gray and Mary Soraci and, upon that sale, cancelled the policy. 1 In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Allstate Insurance v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Lane v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. American Home Assurance Co. v. OsbournCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Luppino v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Utica Mutual Insurance v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Vigilant Insurance Company v. LuppinoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Sherwood Brands, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API