Legal Opinion
Jiosa v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 2001No. 35S00-9910-CR-619Published
1Opinion of the Court
755 N.E.2d 605 (2001)
Bruce A. JIOSA, Appellant (Defendant Below),
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below).
No. 35S00-9910-CR-619.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
October 2, 2001.
Christopher M. Goff, Huntington, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Karen M. Freeman-Wilson, Attorney General of Indiana, Barbara Gasper Hines, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
BOEHM, Justice.
Bruce Jiosa was convicted of molesting his five-year-old daughter. In this direct appeal he contends that the trial court erred when it excluded testimony as a sanction for violation of a pretrial witness…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Jordan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. BlascoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John F. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Carl D. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.