Legal Opinion

Rosenbluth v. Finkelstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1950PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

Although the appeal has become moot and academic, we refrain from dismissing it "because of the importance of the issue presented. Affecting as it does the administration of the emergency housing legislation in the City of New York, the question is one of major importance and, because it will arise again and again, one that invites immediate decision. (See, e.g., Matter of Glenram Wine & Liquor Corp. v. O’Connell, 295 N. Y. 336, 340; Matter of Lyon Co. v. Morris, 261 N. Y. 497, 499.)

A landlord or one who becomes a landlord by purchasing residential property may not procure an eviction of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. H. Kauffman & Sons Saddlery Co. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Matter of Glenram Wine Liquor Corp. v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Matter of Lyon Co. v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Nofree v. LeonardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. MATTER OF UNITED PRESS ASSNS. v. ValenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Gannett Co. v. De PasqualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API