Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McArthur Lumber & Post Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1983No. 82-404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the commission abused its discretion in determining that the saw upon which claimant was injured was a rip saw governed by IC-5-06.04 (B). IC-5-06.04 (B) (1) specifies the type of guard required on a manually-fed circular rip saw, and provides, in pertinent part:

“(b) When in Use:
“When in use the hood-type guard shall automatically adjust itself to the thickness of and remain in contact with the material being cut when the stock encounters the saw, or may be [a] fixed or manually adjusted hood or guard provided the space between the bottom of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Mees v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Cox v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Volker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Sanchez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Volker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API