Legal Opinion
State ex rel. McArthur Lumber & Post Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1983No. 82-404PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the commission abused its discretion in determining that the saw upon which claimant was injured was a rip saw governed by IC-5-06.04 (B). IC-5-06.04 (B) (1) specifies the type of guard required on a manually-fed circular rip saw, and provides, in pertinent part:
“(b) When in Use:
“When in use the hood-type guard shall automatically adjust itself to the thickness of and remain in contact with the material being cut when the stock encounters the saw, or may be [a] fixed or manually adjusted hood or guard provided the space between the bottom of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Mees v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Cox v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Volker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Sanchez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Volker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996