Legal Opinion

Taylor v. J. B. Hill Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1948No. L. A. 20251PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment awarding $1,421.50 damages to plaintiff for breach of contract.

By the terms of a contract dated June 6, 1943 (a written instrument drawn by defendant), which is the basis of the action, defendant agreed to sell and plaintiff to purchase a quantity of barley. The quantity, price, quality, grade, etc., are set forth as follows:

“Quantity Commodity Price Unit How Packed Sample & Grade 10-12000 sacks 1.95 CWT sked H10 Barley . . . Sack Count Indefinite acet. Remarks Now Harvesting May be More or Less. ’ ’ Defendant delivered 6,612 sacks, failing to meet the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Pacific Lumber Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Victoria v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp. v. Howard J. White, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Healy Tibbets Construction Co. v. Employers' Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API