Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Pebworth

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1923No. 10891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The facts in this appeal are that defendant in error, Pebworth, purchased an automobile from plaintiff in error, Henderson, paying some cash, and executing his promissory note to Henderson in the sum of $625 for balance due. At the same time and place it was verbally agreed between the two parties that Pebworth should have his car insured for $850, the price of the car new. Henderson, the seller, suggested' that he would procure the" insurance for Pebworth, the buyer, so that in case of loss the insurance would protect both parties. He also computed the amount of premium, which was $17,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tracey v. CrepinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Patterson v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Methvin v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Johnson v. CullinanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Mainard v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. State Nat. Bank of Shawnee v. Central Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Locke v. First Nat. Bank of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API