Legal Opinion
Osborne v. City of Oklahoma City Police Department
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 27, 1994No. 78091PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice.
Petitioner, James F. Osborne, brought this original proceeding to review the order of the Workers’ Compensation Court denying workers’ compensation benefits to him. The trial judge ruled Osborne did not suffer an accidental injury compensable under the workers’ compensation laws of this state when he developed Panic Attack Disorder with Agoraphobia while working as a law enforcement officer for the Oklahoma City Police Department (OKCPD).
The Court of Appeals reversed the order of the trial court holding Osborne was entitled to workers’ compensation for the mental disorder he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rialto Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Wade Lahar Construction Company v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Fenwick v. Oklahoma State PenitentiarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Oklahoma City v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Keeling v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Kelley v. Waste Management Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Park Terrace v. RaskaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- City of Norman v. HelmCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- Osborne v. City of Oklahoma City Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994