Legal Opinion
Osborne v. City of Oklahoma City Police Department
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 27, 1994No. 78091Published
1Opinion of the Court
882 P.2d 75 (1994)
James F. OSBORNE, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Own Risk, and the Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.
No. 78091.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
September 27, 1994.
Eric H. Hermansen, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.
Vicki Robertson, Holloway, Dobson, Hudson & Bachman, Oklahoma City, for respondents.
SIMMS, Justice.
Petitioner, James F. Osborne, brought this original proceeding to review the order of the Workers' Compensation Court denying workers' compensation benefits to him. The trial judge ruled Osborne did not suffer an accidental injury compensable…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rialto Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Wade Lahar Construction Company v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Fenwick v. Oklahoma State PenitentiarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Oklahoma City v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Keeling v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.