Legal Opinion

Woldman v. Kent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs Fern M. Woldman, David C. Magnano, D.C., and Barbara M. Magnano, and defendants, Henry and Maryanne Kent, are the owners of three parcels of property that share a right of way. Their right-of-way agreement provides that, if. the parties are unable to agree to the repairs and maintenance of the right of way, the dispute will be submitted to arbitration. Supreme Court’s order referring the matter to arbitration required the parties to submit as issues the responsibility for additional repair costs of the right of way caused by any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between National Cash Register Co. & WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. United Buying Service International Corp. v. United Buying Service of Northeastern New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  5. Aigen v. GiannoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API