Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bedard v. Village of Lockbourne

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1990No. 89AP-1372PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCormac, Judge.

Appellants, Gary and Clara Bedard, appeal from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying their request for a writ of mandamus to be issued to the Village Council of Lockbourne, Ohio to vacate its action granting appellee Dorothy Bobst Needham permission to place a mobile home on lot 84 and to require a proper application for her use subject to public knowledge and debate and to issue an injunction requiring her to remove the mobile home.

Appellants assert the following assignments of error:

“I. The trial court committed prejudicial error in finding that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nolte v. NolteOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Conn Construction Co. v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Lessee of Cincinnati v. CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kilroy v. B.H. Lakeshore Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. City of Dayton v. WhitingOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Takacs v. BaldwinOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API