Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Maier & Zobelein Brewery

California Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1901No. L.A. No. 833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

Action by assignee in insolvency to recover the value of certain personal property, consisting of wines, liquors, cigars, saloon fixtures, etc., alleged to have been the property of the insolvent, Kuhl, and to have been transferred by him, in violation of the insolvent law, to defendant, a few days before Kuhl filed his voluntary petition in insolvency. Judgment went for plaintiff in the court below, and defendant appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

The appellant seeks a reversal on three grounds. The first point is, that the court erred in sustaining a demurrer…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Central Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wilbur v. GriffinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API