Legal Opinion

Dobrowsky v. Hanover Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 24, 1984No. 83-1701PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

Karl Heinz Dobrowsky, a Chapter 11 debtor, appeals from a judgment of the district court that affirmed an order of the bankruptcy court denying his claim for damages against the Hanover Insurance Co. (Hanover). The claim asserted under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act1 arises from injuries sustained by Dobrowsky in an automobile accident that occurred in 1981. The primary issue before us is whether the bankruptcy court employed an improper burden of proof in evaluating the medical evidence. We hold that it did and remand.

A

On March…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re DobrowskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API