Legal Opinion

In Re Dobrowsky

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 24, 1984No. 83-1701Published

1Opinion of the Court

735 F.2d 90

In re Karl Heinz DOBROWSKY, Individually and t/a Alster Tool

Co., and Jointly with Ruth Gerda Dobrowsky, Debtors.

Karl Heinz DOBROWSKY, Appellant

v.

The HANOVER INSURANCE CO.

No. 83-1701.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued April 24, 1984.

Decided May 24, 1984.

Jerrold V. Moss (argued), Eric M. Hocky, Rubin, Quinn & Moss, Philadelphia, Pa., for Karl Heinz Dobrowsky.

Charles A. Harad (argued), Judith A. Love, Charles A. Harad & Associates, Philadelphia, Pa., for the Hanover Ins. Co.

Before ADAMS and BECKER, Circuit Judges, and SAROKIN, District Judge.*

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API