Legal Opinion

Keehn v. Parrish Dray Line

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided January 26, 1944No. C. A. No. 1076PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMERMAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a citizen and resident of Illinois, as the statutory receiver of the Central Mutual Insurance Company of Chicago, brings this action to recover from the defendants, who are citizens of South Carolina, residing in this District, the amount of certain assessments alleged to be due by them as the holders of policies of motor vehicle liability insurance issued by the company.

The defendants have filed separate but identical motions to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. At the hearing, it was agreed by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Union Insurance v. HogeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  4. Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Cantey, Adm'r v. Phila. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keehn v. RauchDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API