Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rosendary

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

CAVANAUGH, J.:

¶ 1 Jeffrey Mario Rosendary appeals from the judgment of sentence of from six months to two years imprisonment imposed after he was convicted by a jury of resisting arrest. His only claims on direct appeal raise allegations of trial counsel’s ineffectiveness. There was no hearing conducted on those claims before the trial court. Our supreme court in Commonwealth v. Grant, - Pa. -, 813 A.2d 726 (2002), recently set forth a new general rule providing that parties “should wait to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel until collateral review.” Id. at 738.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WatsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. MillwardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. ThorntonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API