Legal Opinion
State v. Berezansky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 7, 2006PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
899 A.2d 306 (2006)
386 N.J. Super. 84
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Richard F. BEREZANSKY, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 19, 2006.
Decided June 7, 2006.
Stanley F. Rizzolo, Somerville, argued the cause for appellant (Rizzolo & Rizzolo, attorneys; Mr. Rizzolo, on the brief).
Daryl A. Williams, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Wayne J. Forrest, Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney; James L. McConnell, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges WECKER, FUENTES and GRAVES.
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. MatulewiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. HeislerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Magruder v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- State v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. TsetsekasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- New Century Financial Services Inc. v. OughlaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.