Legal Opinion
State v. Heisler
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 17, 2011PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
OSTRER, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
The principal issue in this appeal from a conviction after a trial de novo in the Law Division requires us to construe two provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-19, the notice and demand statute in the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-1 to N.J.S.A. 2C:36A-1.1 First, the statute requires the State to notify a defendant at least twenty days before trial that it intends to offer into evidence a laboratory certificate (lab certificate) regarding the composition, quality and quantity of drugs, and must furnish…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. WashingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Michael Anthony SalcidoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. ShawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- State v. WolfeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- BUCCHERI v. NOGANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.